I try to keep an eye on how people get to this blog, using WordPress and Google tools, and I especially take note of old posts that are still getting traffic.<\/p>\n
Apparently the most popular of my old posts is one I wrote almost two years ago about university exams.<\/p>\n
I’ve edited the post a little, and if you didn’t read it yet, you might want to check it out:<\/p>\n
\nA Tirade Against Exams<\/a><\/h3>\n
[…]<\/p>\n
So why are exams a bad idea<\/em>\u00a0when you want to check whether a bunch of science undergrads understood what you taught them? Well, one part of the problem should be obvious to anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of science:exams are not very good experiments.<\/em>\u00a0There is no way to control for\u00a0interference of irrelevant, extraneous factors<\/a>. When scientists conduct a study, in any field and with any methodology, they seek to control for irrelevant interferences. For example, when psychologists test hand-eye coordination, they\u2019ll do something like only taking right-handed people with healthy hands and eyes, in order to make sure that the results aren\u2019t skewed by irrelevant differences between individuals.<\/p>\n
You can\u2019t do anything like that in exams.<\/p>\n