I gather that for many of them, the children were unhappy in the religious official schools and their unhappiness there also caused them to distance themselves from the religion. The one thing all Sudbury Jerusalem parents tend to have in common is caring a lot about their children’s happiness, and being able to put it above other things which deter them from sending their kids there. Over time we saw many kids from Orthodox families rediscover Judaism in a non-coercive way while at school. In addition, parents who cared a lot about their children’s religious education took it into their own hands, and I recall some of them being very pleased with the connection this formed between them and their children, as well as their children’s reconnecting to Judaism through it.
]]>Actually, at least during my time at Sudbury Jerusalem, a small *majority* of the students were from orthodox and modern orthodox families.
]]>Obviously, I agree that it is possible to get ahead with education considered unusual. The point is rather than when you are labelled with an underprivileged background, people judge you in a different way. I get the impression that this causes underprivileged groups to aspire towards social stamps of approval in the form of achievements, academic and otherwise, which are broadly and easily recognized by mainstream society as desirable and/or impressive.
Two years before we started Sudbury Jerusalem, I started going to the “experimental school”, which is far, far less radical in the freedom it gives students. (From a Sudbury perspective, it’s just a traditional school.) Nonetheless, I remember people around me talking about that school with disdain, as though allowing students freedom means giving up on any chance of their achieving anything in life. These attitudes are out there, and I think they are part of the picture.
And of course, tuition is a very important piece of the puzzle as well. Thanks for bringing that back into the discussion! :)
]]>Sudbury schools are not so unusual as to not attract families from disadvantaged backgrounds — or any other background.
The problem by now is Democratic schools in most cases are private schools. You have to pay tuition to attend. So far as the state “pays” for education, who wants to pay twice for sending their kids to school ?: first, to the state, and then, to the private school.
I am sure you can get ahead in society without socially-approved education. Watch Sir Ken Robinson’s “Do schools kill creativity?” http://youtu.be/fnzTHB2G6cE or the whole lecture: http://youtu.be/iG9CE55wbtY (starting at 15:08), about Gillian Barbara Lynne, choreographer and dancer, Cats, The Phantom of the Opera – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillian_Lynne#Early_life_and_education .
Check also this (in Hebrew):
http://haifademocratic.org.il/
http://www.facebook.com/haifademofratic
http://www.atzuma.co.il/haifademocratic
http://cafe.themarker.com/topic/2559230/
http://cafe.themarker.com/topic/2848671/
http://cafe.themarker.com/topic/2892615/